subatomic particle Apparently faster than Light ><“
iheby發表於2011年 9月27日 2:01
(非常)粗略估算:
設地球為正球體,(最大)圓周 = 40,000 km,r 為地球半徑 = 40000 / (2π),c 為光速
O 點為地心,中微子/光 由地表 A 點到 B 點,則 r = OA = OB
弧AB = 730 km
直線AB:考慮 三角 ΔOAB,以 cosine rule 得
2r²(1-cos θ) = AB²,θ = ∠AOB
另 rθ = 弧AB = 730 km,θ = 730 / r
直線AB ≒ 729.6 km
以當時被錄得時間比光速還早 60ns,中微子所走距離 = ( 730/c - 60ns ) v,v = 中微子速度
若中微子以光速前進,它走了 730 - 60ns(c) ≒ 729.982 km
729.6 km < 729.982 km < 730 km
結果不低於下限,中微子速度上仍有低於光速的下調空間。
中微子愈慢,它愈要採取較接近 直線AB 的路徑,才可以保持早到60ns
C.L. 的觀點仍屬合理。
=====
但不排除科學團隊其實早已把地球弧度納入計算
http://forum.hkas.org.hk/viewthread.php ... a=page%3D1
(非常)粗略估算:
設地球為正球體,(最大)圓周 = 40,000 km,r 為地球半徑 = 40000 / (2π),c 為光速
O 點為地心,中微子/光 由地表 A 點到 B 點,則 r = OA = OB
弧AB = 730 km
直線AB:考慮 三角 ΔOAB,以 cosine rule 得
2r²(1-cos θ) = AB²,θ = ∠AOB
另 rθ = 弧AB = 730 km,θ = 730 / r
直線AB ≒ 729.6 km
以當時被錄得時間比光速還早 60ns,中微子所走距離 = ( 730/c - 60ns ) v,v = 中微子速度
若中微子以光速前進,它走了 730 - 60ns(c) ≒ 729.982 km
729.6 km < 729.982 km < 730 km
結果不低於下限,中微子速度上仍有低於光速的下調空間。
中微子愈慢,它愈要採取較接近 直線AB 的路徑,才可以保持早到60ns
C.L. 的觀點仍屬合理。
=====
但不排除科學團隊其實早已把地球弧度納入計算
http://forum.hkas.org.hk/viewthread.php ... a=page%3D1
http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%85%89%E9%80%9F
真空中的光速等於299,792,458米/秒(1,079,252,848.8千米/小時)。[2] 這個速度並不是一個測量值,而是一個定義。
看英文版卻沒有此句,不知怎麼,總是覺得這句話的邏輯有點不妥。 [推眼鏡]Wah!! 寫:http://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%85%89%E9%80%9F
真空中的光速等於299,792,458米/秒(1,079,252,848.8千米/小時)。[2] 這個速度並不是一個測量值,而是一個定義。
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light
未經實驗所得的測量結果,我們怎樣知道光速的值?
You are absolutely correct.Wah!! 寫:In 1983, the metre was redefined in the International System of Units (SI) as the distance travelled by light in vacuum in 1⁄299,792,458 of a second. As a result, the numerical value of c in metres per second is now fixed exactly by the definition of the metre.[5]
This is echoed by the Physics FAQ web maintained by the Mathematics department, University of California, Riverside.
(my colour highlight)http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html 寫:At the 1983 Conference Generale des Poids et Mesures, the following SI (Systeme International) definition of the metre was adopted:
The metre is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second.
This defines the speed of light in vacuum to be exactly 299,792,458 m/s. This provides a very short answer to the question "Is c constant": Yes, c is constant by definition!
Because we now define distance by the speed of light, relativity effects have to be understood by time dilation rather than distance changes.
鄧登凳 寫:You are absolutely correct.Wah!! 寫:In 1983, the metre was redefined in the International System of Units (SI) as the distance travelled by light in vacuum in 1⁄299,792,458 of a second. As a result, the numerical value of c in metres per second is now fixed exactly by the definition of the metre.[5]
This is echoed by the Physics FAQ web maintained by the Mathematics department, University of California, Riverside.
(my colour highlight)http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativity/SpeedOfLight/speed_of_light.html 寫:At the 1983 Conference Generale des Poids et Mesures, the following SI (Systeme International) definition of the metre was adopted:
The metre is the length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299 792 458 of a second.
This defines the speed of light in vacuum to be exactly 299,792,458 m/s. This provides a very short answer to the question "Is c constant": Yes, c is constant by definition!
Because we now define distance by the speed of light, relativity effects have to be understood by time dilation rather than distance changes.
他們說光速是定義值,並不表示光速不是可測量的值。
This statement is definitely incorrect.鄧登凳 寫: Because we now define distance by the speed of light, relativity effects have to be understood by time dilation rather than distance changes.
誰在線上
正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 32 位訪客