請問如何可以防止器材發霉?

Celestron Meade Vixen Takahashi Astrophysics
Sbig CCD ToUcam Coronado Filter Nikon Canon
<br> 目鏡 ED折射鏡 反射鏡 折反射鏡 太陽望遠鏡 鑢鏡 相機 鏡頭
c++
星際雲
文章: 29
註冊時間: 週二 11 4月, 2006 14:06

文章 c++ » 週一 24 2月, 2014 07:05

Dear 鄧Sir,
According to Wiki, the max [suction] of normal household vac cleaner is around 20Kpa, about 0.2 atm, significantly weaker than the vacuum made by condensed vapor(pressure drop may close to 1 atm).

頭像
鄧登凳
夸克星
文章: 9493
註冊時間: 週一 03 8月, 2009 17:15
來自: 3rd planet of solar system

文章 鄧登凳 » 週一 24 2月, 2014 17:32

c++ 寫:Dear 鄧Sir,
According to Wiki, the max [suction] of normal household vac cleaner is around 20Kpa, about 0.2 atm, significantly weaker than the vacuum made by condensed vapor(pressure drop may close to 1 atm).
It never requires all the steam to condense to collapse a steel drum. I guess it would be about 0.5 atm. BTW, steel drums are much stronger than telescope optical tube.

Yes, household vacumm cleaner is not design to achieve high vacuum and 0.2 atm seems like a reasonable figure.

What force is 0.2 atm representing? 1 atm = 101325 Pa, i.e. 101325 Newton per metre square. Assuming that you have a 90mm lens. Area = (0.09/2)^2 X 3.14 = 0.00636 m^2. The force on the lens will be 644N. It represents approximate putting a 64kg weight ON your lens. If you would like to put more than twelve big counterweights (my iEQ45 counterweight is 5kg each) on top of your lens, be my guest. [萬年奸臣]

c++
星際雲
文章: 29
註冊時間: 週二 11 4月, 2006 14:06

文章 c++ » 週一 24 2月, 2014 20:09

鄧登凳 寫:
c++ 寫:Dear 鄧Sir,
According to Wiki, the max [suction] of normal household vac cleaner is around 20Kpa, about 0.2 atm, significantly weaker than the vacuum made by condensed vapor(pressure drop may close to 1 atm).
It never requires all the steam to condense to collapse a steel drum. I guess it would be about 0.5 atm. BTW, steel drums are much stronger than telescope optical tube.

Yes, household vacumm cleaner is not design to achieve high vacuum and 0.2 atm seems like a reasonable figure.

What force is 0.2 atm representing? 1 atm = 101325 Pa, i.e. 101325 Newton per metre square. Assuming that you have a 90mm lens. Area = (0.09/2)^2 X 3.14 = 0.00636 m^2. The force on the lens will be 644N. It represents approximate putting a 64kg weight ON your lens. If you would like to put more than twelve big counterweights (my iEQ45 counterweight is 5kg each) on top of your lens, be my guest. [萬年奸臣]
Dear 鄧Sir,
Firstly, vacuum created by steam condensation can be easily exeed 0.9 atm, as satuated vapor presussure at room temprature is only 2~3 Kpa(~0.02 atm)
Secondary, as the pressure are actually apply to the dust cover rather than the lens itself, and the tube is far from air tight, so the pressure on both sides of the lens are well balenced, thus the lens is free from any stress on the front surface,as long as the dust cover survives.
Third, it seem that the number 64kgf needs to multiple by 0.2, thus the pressure on the dust cover is about 13kgf, it will quite probable survive.

頭像
鄧登凳
夸克星
文章: 9493
註冊時間: 週一 03 8月, 2009 17:15
來自: 3rd planet of solar system

文章 鄧登凳 » 週一 24 2月, 2014 22:33

c++ 寫:
Dear 鄧Sir,
Firstly, vacuum created by steam condensation can be easily exeed 0.9 atm, as satuated vapor presussure at room temprature is only 2~3 Kpa(~0.02 atm)
Secondary, as the pressure are actually apply to the dust cover rather than the lens itself, and the tube is far from air tight, so the pressure on both sides of the lens are well balenced, thus the lens is free from any stress on the front surface,as long as the dust cover survives.
Third, it seem that the number 64kgf needs to multiple by 0.2, thus the pressure on the dust cover is about 13kgf, it will quite probable survive.
1. As steam is itself a poor conductor of heat, the steam inside the container never reached room temperature when it collapses. If you have done similar experiment in school, you will find the can/container is still quite hot (50 to 60C) after it collapse.

2. Never assume the telescope tube to be all round. With various devices such as focuser, attachment points for finder scope... there are many high stress points.

3. Even for 13kgf, see if you can put 13kg on top of your lens cap. Don't blame me if you bend it or break it. (I made a mistake, the initial calculation was based on a C8 SCT with 203mm front lens. That ends up with 65kgf, I forgot to change the calculation when changing to a smaller telescope)

A household vacuum food sealer has even less power than a home vacuum cleaner. According to you, it cannot crush a can, can it? See for yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIl7U9xbM1M

c++
星際雲
文章: 29
註冊時間: 週二 11 4月, 2006 14:06

文章 c++ » 週二 25 2月, 2014 06:53

鄧登凳 寫:
c++ 寫:
Dear 鄧Sir,
Firstly, vacuum created by steam condensation can be easily exeed 0.9 atm, as satuated vapor presussure at room temprature is only 2~3 Kpa(~0.02 atm)
Secondary, as the pressure are actually apply to the dust cover rather than the lens itself, and the tube is far from air tight, so the pressure on both sides of the lens are well balenced, thus the lens is free from any stress on the front surface,as long as the dust cover survives.
Third, it seem that the number 64kgf needs to multiple by 0.2, thus the pressure on the dust cover is about 13kgf, it will quite probable survive.
1. As steam is itself a poor conductor of heat, the steam inside the container never reached room temperature when it collapses. If you have done similar experiment in school, you will find the can/container is still quite hot (50 to 60C) after it collapse.

2. Never assume the telescope tube to be all round. With various devices such as focuser, attachment points for finder scope... there are many high stress points.

3. Even for 13kgf, see if you can put 13kg on top of your lens cap. Don't blame me if you bend it or break it. (I made a mistake, the initial calculation was based on a C8 SCT with 203mm front lens. That ends up with 65kgf, I forgot to change the calculation when changing to a smaller telescope)

A household vacuum food sealer has even less power than a home vacuum cleaner. According to you, it cannot crush a can, can it? See for yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cIl7U9xbM1M

Dear 鄧Sir,
1.Even at 60C, the saturated vapor pressure for water is only 0.2 atm(0.12 atm at 50C), the pressure difference from ambient air is 0.8~0.88 atm, 4 times stronger than the maximum ability to vacuum cleaner. This only proves how powerful vacuum created by condensation can be.
2.For uneven shape like finder base, the pressure cancels out except the face it attaches the OTA, thus to the OTA it feels no difference.
3.Yes for large tubes even weak vacuum is still a thread. But for smaller one as the previous example you provided, 13 kgf is evenly applied to the surface of the cover, and as the dust cover is rim-supported, it might not as bad as we think.
If we still have concern, just put one or two kitchen stainless steel disc on top of the dust cover will strengthen the cover quite a lot.
4. Vacuum food sealer is by no means weaker than vacuum cleaner in creating vacuum, unless suction data is provided. The logic is simple, though vacuum cleaner is very noisy and consumes more electricity power, it is designed to work with large air flow to suck the dirt. While food sealer is designed to create higher pressure drop for sealed bags--very low air flow required, so it can employ more specialized pumps.
4.1 For aluminum beverage cans, the wall can as thin as 0.09mm, normal people can crash it from the middle of the cylinder with TWO FINGERS. Can anyone(except for Kongfu masters) crash, or even dent any telescope tube with all of his fingers?

So my points are: A, vacuum is powerful, but not the weak one created by home cleaner, anyway its corrugated plastic pipe will collapse far before the OTA tube, I even push the open of cleaner hose to my hand to feel the suction before; B, for large OTA, the weak negative pressure might still be dangerous.

頭像
鄧登凳
夸克星
文章: 9493
註冊時間: 週一 03 8月, 2009 17:15
來自: 3rd planet of solar system

文章 鄧登凳 » 週二 25 2月, 2014 11:13

My suggestion to use vacuum bag is based on its air tight property, not that vacuum is needed or useful in storing instrument.

I made my warning about using vacuum cleaner to suck air out of a vacuum bag storing astronomical instrustment. Even if a OTA is not crushed completely by vacuum, excessive force may affect collimation of lenses etc. If you think it is safe, then you can do it your way and bear the consequences.

頭像
vr2xsc
主序星
文章: 246
註冊時間: 週四 18 9月, 2003 22:03
來自: Hong Kong
聯繫:

文章 vr2xsc » 週二 25 2月, 2014 12:32

我已經整左! :D
附加檔案
2014-02-22 18.07.07.jpg
2014-02-22 18.07.07.jpg (111.06 KiB) 已瀏覽 2849 次
2014-02-22 21.07.56.jpg
2014-02-22 21.07.56.jpg (105.21 KiB) 已瀏覽 2847 次

回覆文章

回到「廠製儀器 Factory Equipment」

誰在線上

正在瀏覽這個版面的使用者:沒有註冊會員 和 7 位訪客